It Isn’t About What is Seen

martin
Artist Agnes Martin, 1912-2004

Another thank you to Pam Farrell for leading me to artist Susan York’s account of her relationship with the legendary Agnes Martin. I’ve included the text at the end of this post. It offers a compelling window into Martin’s way of seeing the world.

Martin is a quirky but powerful presence in contemporary American art. She was one of several extremely talented women artists of a certain generation who came to the art mecca that was New York City in the 40’s and 50s only to eventually flee to other climes. That group also includes Joan Mitchell and Lee Bontecou.

Martin found her connection in the deserts of New Mexico, living out her life in a simple, monk-like manner. The story circulated that she didn’t read a newspaper for 50 years. One of her statements captures something about the way she lived: Perfection is in the mind.

Her writings have a Koan-like quality to them—metaphysical, mysterious, sometimes contradictory—but her work continued to explore a quiet intensity that never dissipated. She was painting right up until her death at the age of 92. When a writer for the New Yorker came to visit her just a few years before her death, Martin was still spending her mornings working in her studio. As Martin emerged from her morning session, she made this simple but profound pronouncement: Painting is hard work. That’s a truism that holds whether you are a nonagenarian or not.

I have been moved to tears several times standing in front of an Agnes Martin painting. They do not reproduce well. Dia Beacon has a room dedicated to her work, and there are fine examples in a number of leading museums. But they must be experienced in the flesh, first hand. The delicacy of her graphite lines, the respect for the imperfections of the canvas—those are all impossible to capture in a photographic image.

I first saw the artist Agnes Martin lecture in 1982 in Albuquerque. She said: “My paintings are not about what is seen. They are about what is known forever in the mind.” I thought she was speaking directly to me.

It took me a year to find the courage to call her. I wrote out a script of what I would say and laid my yellow legal pad with the dialogue printed in blue ink in front of me.

“Hello,” answered the plain, flat voice.

I couldn’t think of what to say. My heart began beating faster; the silence continued. Finally, I read from my paper: “Hello, Ms. Martin, this is Susan York.”

“Oh, yes, hello.”

“I sent you a postcard for a show I’m in,” I said, following my lines.

“Yes, I got it,” she said. “And I can’t decide.”

Can’t decide? I frantically scanned the yellow paper, looking futilely for the right words. “Can’t decide?”
“No. Can’t decide if you’re ready to be internationally recognized or not. Won’t be able to tell that until I see the work.”

I kept searching my page.

“Well, uh, would you like to come see the show?”

“No, never do that.”

I was trying to come up with a reply when she finally spoke.

“You can come for tea,” she said. “At 3.”

The next thing I heard was the dial tone.

The road to Galisteo cut across a wide mesa. In the distance, layers of blue mountain ranges rested behind clouds, trees and ancient petroglyphs. Agnes, in her early 70’s on that afternoon in 1983, stood in the doorway of her house. Her short salt-and-pepper hair framed red cheeks and blue eyes that sometimes seemed to be on the earth and other times beyond it.

The small home resembled a New Mexico tract house with a white generic interior. Everything was spare and tidy; three rocking chairs in the living room and one picture that looked like a Georgia O’Keeffe print.

As in her books, she spoke in absolutes. “Never have children. Do not live the middle-class life. Never do anything that will take away from your work.”

Opening the door to her studio, she said, “Never let anyone in your studio.” It was a long, simple adobe building that Agnes had built by hand. She had no electricity in there and worked only from the morning until 3 p.m.

I was struck silent by a 6-by-6-foot painting composed of horizontal lines and washes of gray. Did she tell me it was geese flying, or did I dream it that night? Infinite washes of gray paint held by graphite lines, the painting made me think of the almost steady line of a child’s pencil meeting watery Japanese calligraphy.

She told me she wanted to preserve the work of the Abstract Expressionists. She asked me about the Zen center where I lived and had a studio. I had no way of knowing it then, but for the next several years I would meet her nearly every month for tea or dinner. I learned about the artist’s life from her, long before I had found my own. I was just a few years out of college, but I thought time was running out. “I didn’t get my first show until I was 45,” she said, fixing her penetrating gaze on me. “If I could tell you anything, I would tell you that you have time.”

Over the next decade, I continued making my art, but as Agnes often told me, I was frustrated. Something was missing in my work that I still hadn’t been able to grasp. She told me she had once worked as a dishwasher, saving enough money to spend an entire year solely in her studio. She thought I should do the same; instead, I entered graduate school.

In my work there, I sieved powdered pigment onto the floor, filling rooms with giant arcs and rectangles. Afterward I was pleased to have nothing left but a bag of swept-up pigment.

When I met Agnes the following summer, she thought the new work was ridiculous.

“How are you going to sell it if it ends up in a garbage bag?” she asked in that flat voice that sounded like the truth. And in fact, it was the truth.

But I knew this work held the missing piece: I realized that I wanted to distill thousands of miles into a single inch. Today, I cover whole rooms in graphite, rubbing the walls with my hand until the flat black carbon turns infinitely silver.

My hand was covered in graphite when I heard that Agnes had died. It was around this time last December, and I remember the world became quiet.

(This piece was published in the New York Times Magazine in 2005 after Martin’s death in December of 2004.)

9 Replies to “It Isn’t About What is Seen”

  1. Thanks for sharing this. It was good to read this morning before I get going on the usual law school junk. How many times a day do I dream about quitting, cashing out what’s left of my portfolio, hunkering into a small room to write somewhere in the dry heat of California’s central valley or the rocky hills outside of Madrid where I’d keep little more than a pair of goats and another of German shepherds and a laptop. Instead, I am researching a paper on the failed dispersion strategies of collateralized debt obligations in the wake of the Community Reinvestment Act.

    “It isn’t about what is seen.” I need that to be true.

  2. VinV, I love your daydream. Rocky hills outside Madrid, with goats…Reading that, I’m off in another life.

    Like you, reality is very much in my face way too much these days. Thanks for your input, I can always count on your lively mind to add something special to any particular cloud of thinking.

  3. “never have children. Do not live the middle class life. Never do anything that will take you away from your work.”
    An instructor I had 13 years ago might have uttered these same sentiments. He, too, was an art monk, living and working and praying in front of his work, daily, with devotion. His paintings were also rigorous and beautiful, in a different way to martin’s, but sharing the extreme demands of building up beautiful marks. There is somethin amazingly compelling in austerity – in life, in work, in relationships. maybe in another life I’ll brave that road…. G

  4. G, like you, advice like Martin’s was not advice I chose to follow, nor did I feel like the decision to have a family was a difficult one for me to make. Like your instructor, some people are inclined to the ascetic life. It is a force and level of devotion that Malcolm Gladwell talks about in his new book. Obsessional and completely devoted.

    But I don’t believe it is the only way. I know a lot of great artists who have chosen a more balanced approach, and I love work that comes from every end of that life choice spectrum.

    I don’t think there is an “answer” to this quandary. Just a whole lot of different approaches.

  5. I think there’s an answer. The answer is the approach you did not take.

  6. E, re your comment:

    Are you saying that no matter what path you take it is the wrong one, or are you saying that there is an answer and Martin is right?

  7. Once, when Paul Taylor was asked what his sexual preference was, he answered, “Whoever I’m not with.” I think I meant something like that. The promise, and the value, of the approach not taken — whatever it is — becomes clearer and clearer in fantasy and in retrospect, once you’ve gone off the cliff with the approach you did choose. At such times, it’s especially important to remember that the road not taken is pure fantasy, not some other route concretely laid out for us that we turned away from.

  8. E, Thanks for the clarification. Yes, and yes.

  9. […] thanks to Deborah Barlow and her blog, Slow Muse.  Deborah has done a number of posts about Agnes Martin.  Deborah is a painter herself and her intelligent, insightful blog never disappoints. I highly […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: