Memoiramania


Memoirist extraordinaire Mary Karr (Photo: Todd Plitt, USA TODAY)

TMI. It’s like drinking: Some can handle a lot, and some are flattened after just one glass.

Meanwhile we are living in an age of rampant confessionalism, memoiring gone viral, with more blogs than there are humans and way too much information being flung at us about the lives of all those famous people. So it is easy to be in sympathy with the opening salvo of Neil Genzlinger’s review of a new crop of memoirs that appeared in the Sunday Times Book Review:

A moment of silence, please, for the lost art of shutting up.

There was a time when you had to earn the right to draft a memoir, by accomplishing something noteworthy or having an extremely unusual experience or being such a brilliant writer that you could turn relatively ordinary occur­rences into a snapshot of a broader historical moment. Anyone who didn’t fit one of those categories was obliged to keep quiet. Unremarkable lives went unremarked upon, the way God intended.

But then came our current age of oversharing, and all heck broke loose. These days, if you’re planning to browse the “memoir” listings on Amazon, make sure you’re in a comfortable chair, because that search term produces about 40,000 hits, or 60,000, or 160,000, depending on how you execute it.

I am not a story teller but the maker of non-narrative visual art. As a result I don’t have a professional stake in story telling in all of its many forms. But like you, I too love a great tale, the seduction of cinema, novels that whisk us far from our own lives and into the throes of someone else’s adventure. And masterful, compelling memoirs have been written of course, like anything by Mary Karr.*

But as Genzlinger points out (with no mincing of words):

That you had parents and a childhood does not of itself qualify you to write a memoir. This maxim, which was inspired by an unrewarding few hours with “Dis­aster Preparedness,” by Heather Havri­lesky, is really a response to a broader problem, a sort of grade inflation for life experiences. A vast majority of people used to live lives that would draw a C or a D if grades were being passed out — not that they were bad lives, just bland. Now, though, practically all of us have somehow gotten the idea that we are B+ or A material; it’s the “if it happened to me, it must be interesting” fallacy. And so Havrilesky…spends 239 pages dragging us through what seems to be an utterly ordinary childhood in North Carolina…The rest belongs on a blog.

That you had parents and a childhood does not of itself qualify you to write a memoir. That might make a worthwhile fridge magnet. Enough already?

Regarding his comment that “the rest belongs on a blog,” I will make the argument that may sound self serving but is still legitimate: there are blogs and then there are blogs. I spend enough time on content-rich sites where the personal is kept to a mere ornament to know how valuable the blogosphere is for the idea-rich, provocative reading I enjoy. But maybe we do need a cordoned off section, a blogobadlands where the tell-all, the “I’ll listen to your story if you’ll listen to mine,” the “my life is really meaningful and I’m going to tell you all about it!” types can gather, a place where it is agreed that your story is your primary currency and the swapping of personal anecdotes is the norm.

Finding a respectable middle ground between coldly detached, intellectual content and the warm and fuzzy personal is a Maginot Line that is constantly moving. This shift ican be seen both in written expression as well as in our social norms. Well researched, factual books such as Woman: An Intimate Geography by Natalie Angier includes just enough of the personal to keep the reader in a warm and welcoming space. Angier never overshares but finds a pitch perfect blend of fact and her own experiences. It used to be that no therapist would allow any first person anecdoting to play a part in therapy. That concept sounds oddly outdated and unduly formalized based on today’s more natural, conversational, coaching-esque therapy styles.

In the spirit of Kevin Kelly and Stephen Johnson’s claim (I referenced the original comment here) that you have to wade through a lot of crap to get to the really good stuff, I’d say the same may be true with memoirs and the overly personal. Story telling is important. Most of us don’t do it with artfulness. But for those who do, they deserve our time and attention.

Of the four books Genzlinger reviews, only one of them emerges with a thumbs up: Johanna Adorjan’s An Exclusive Love, a “spare, beautiful exploration of why her grandparents killed themselves.” And his point is well taken:

If you still must write a memoir, consider making yourself the least important character in it…what makes a good memoir — it’s not a regurgitation of ordinariness or ordeal, not a dart thrown desperately at a trendy topic, but a shared discovery. Maybe that’s a good rule of thumb: If you didn’t feel you were discovering something as you wrote your memoir, don’t publish it. Instead hit the delete key, and then go congratulate yourself for having lived a perfectly good, undistinguished life. There’s no shame in that.

________
*On the blog, 100 Memoirs, Shirley Hershey Showalter has compiled a list of Mary Karr’s favorite memoirs. This is useful since IMHO Karr is the contemporary master of the form.

1. Maxine Hong Kingston, The Woman Warrior
2. Richard Wright, Black Boy
3. Hilary Mantel, Giving Up the Ghost
4. Robert Graves, Goodbye to All That
5. Malcolm X, The Autobiography of Malcolm X
6. John Howard Griffin, Black Like Me
7. Tobias Wolff, This Boy’s Life
8. Michael Herr, Dispatches
9. Maya Angelou, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
10. Frederick Exley, A Fan’s Notes

6 Replies to “Memoiramania”

  1. I read a lot of biographies, autobiographies, and memoirs and when I read that Times piece Sunday I nodded my head in agreement.

    A couple of weeks ago I finished Linda Sexton’s latest memoir. I stuck with it but was disappointed. The last several chapters easily could have been cut and the book would not have suffered. In more than one place, Sexton became almost bathetic. And I will admit that her constant pushing of her “legacy of suicide” theory began to grate after a bit. The most interesting thing in the book was the revelation that she had become a “cutter”, and her description of the times she cut herself were fascinating because of her own fascination with the act.

    I’m now reading the book about Henrietta Lacks.

  2. Perceptive post. Memoir is the 800 lb gorilla in the literary room, IMO — a genre which has ballooned as self-centered reflexiveness has also come to occupy the cultural landscape. Karr’s memoirs are fine, and reflect the sort of memoir I admire, where the writer takes responsibility for their angels and demons and presses them into the service of becoming a better writer. Poets who turn to prose are an interesting breed, too; their finest work goes unread, while their looser accommodations with truth make a mint. That’s the reverse law of things on earth — the less spiritual value a thing has, the bigger buck you can make on it. I liked Wolff’s memoir, too. (You’ve probably addressed this elsewhere, but what is the difference between memoir and autobiography? Memoir, I think, is the tone poem, the mystery inside the history.)

  3. 16 year old Justin Beiber has an autobiography…Yikes! nuff said

  4. judy gardner says:

    I’ve just begun to follow your blog and am enjoying it very much. thank you for the good work you put into it and how interesting it is for us, your readers.

    Well done

  5. Thank you for the value added Maureen, Brendan, Di and Judy. Brendan, thank you for the distinction you make between memoir and autobiography–“a tone poem, the mystery inside the history”–that rings true. And Maureen, thank you for the Guernica link. Resource central!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: