Other Conversations


From the Leonardo Drew exhibit at the deCordova Museum. Drew said he has noticed that the more he touches things, the better they get. (More about this amazing show coming here soon.)

This morning I tried to describe to my friend Linda how the energy in my studio can shift suddenly in ways I find difficult to predict or control. A form may appear quite by accident while painting that produces an unexpected sense of elation and expansion. Linda listened to my halting description of this instantaneous reaction and suggested that the relationship we have with visual imagery is more complex than we might have supposed. Yes, we are about the job of bringing new forms into existence. But there is the possibility that those invented forms are capable of entering into an esoteric dialectic, a back and forth that does not live in language as we currently use it.

This is an exchange that is subtle and rarely referenced in the art criticism and theory I have read. There are hints at this, like the following quote from Stevens (But of course! My favorite all time poet):

When I was a boy I used to think that things progressed by contrasts, that there was a law of contrasts. But this was building the world out of blocks. Afterwards I came to think of the energizing that comes from mere interplay, interaction. Thus, the various faculties of the mind co-exist and interact, and there is as much delight in this mere co-existence as man and woman find in each other’s company . . . Cross reflections, modifications, counter-balances, complements, giving and taking are illimitable. They make things inter-dependent and their inter-dependence sustains them and gives them pleasure.

–Wallace Stevens, 1940 Letter to Hi Simons

Thank you to such stuff, a wonderful treasure trove of images and ideas, for this memorable quote.

2 Replies to “Other Conversations”

  1. Coincidence: I just read this piece at Arts Fuse on Drew: http://artsfuse.org/?p=14765

    You might like this quote of Jane Smiley: “There are many inventors whose personal life is just subsumed into their projects. That’s Atanasoff. That’s why he had a happy life: not because he was or wasn’t recognized, but because the things he built turned out to be what he thought they were going to be.” Smiley just pub’d a biography on Atanasoff, “The Man Who Invented the Computer”. An interview with her is in November issue of “Wired” (which J. gets).

    Like the such stuff site.

  2. Maureen, as always, the master of value adding…thanks so much for this, both the link to a thoughtful review of Drew’s career and recent show as well as a compelling quote by Jane Smiley. Thanks for deepening whatever row I hoe.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: